Adrian Andreev vs Gilles Arnaud Bailly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When evaluating second serve effectiveness in recent months, Gilles Arnaud Bailly has secured 41.90% of points, while Adrian Andreev has not won any. What could this signify about their upcoming match? It may suggest a potential advantage for Bailly.
• A closer look at return game performance shows Bailly winning 44.83% of second serve return points in recent form, whereas Andreev has again scored 0%—an indication of a strong return game for Bailly.
• Under pressure, Bailly has managed to save 46.23% of breakpoints, a stark contrast to Andreev's 0%. Could this trait prove decisive? Quite possibly, as it indicates Bailly's fortitude in critical situations.
• In terms of overall match wins, Bailly has been victorious in 73.56% of his matches this past year, compared to Andreev's 31.82%. This could heavily favor Bailly for the upcoming match.
• Examining surface preference, Bailly excels on hard courts with a win percentage of 69%, whereas Andreev is best suited to clay with an identical percentage, potentially affecting the match outcome depending on surface.
• Bailly, frequenting Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, wins 74.32% of his matches, while Andreev, in the higher-level Challengers/ITF, wins 29.41%. Does Bailly's match practice at lower levels give him an edge?
• Considering the quality of opponents, Bailly competes against players ranked on average 388.99, whereas Andreev faces higher-ranked players with an average rank of 263.82, offering a context to their performance stats.
• Should the match extend to a deciding set, Bailly holds a winning rate of 67%, marginally ahead of Andreev's 50%, suggesting Bailly's resilience in tight situations.
• Current event performances are important as well, though specifics were not provided for this matchup.

Editorial Prediction (October 6, 2025, UTC):

Bailly appears to have a distinct edge in various performance metrics, notably in second serve and return stats as well as in critical breakpoint situations. His superior winning rate over the past year further emphasizes his current form, despite competing mostly at lower-level events.

Surface preference is a less critical factor given the lack of specificity about the match surface, but should it be on hard courts, Bailly's strengths there would likely become more pronounced.

Despite facing opponents of a lower average ranking, Bailly's winning consistency notably stands out against Andreev's struggles at higher-level events.

Based on these comprehensive comparisons and insights, Gilles Arnaud Bailly is the most probable winner in the upcoming match, given his recent form and statistical dominance.